Showing posts with label california. Show all posts
Showing posts with label california. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Sick and Twisted
I'd like to dare all of the sick and twisted people who are honoring Hugo Chavez right now to go live in Venezuela for a year and then tell me how wonderful he was (as soon as you've recovered).
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
An Awesome Story
Once upon a time there was a band called Whiteheart. During their first four years, the band leaders struggled to find a lead singer. One guy quit, another didn't work out, still another backslid, and so on. They had started giving auditions again, when they found their tour bus driver singing and dancing to one of their songs up on stage. His name was Rick Florian.
(Whiteheart's most famous albums were produced with Florian as the lead singer.)
(Whiteheart's most famous albums were produced with Florian as the lead singer.)
Labels:
awesome,
band,
california,
christ,
christian,
christian perspective,
conservative,
constitution,
easter,
end times,
freedom,
God,
Jesus,
Lord
Time for a Third Party?
The only time a third party has ever risen to power in the United States was when the Republican Party defeated the Whig Party and the Democratic-Republican Party with the election of Abraham Lincoln. Why? Because both the Whig Party and Democratic-Republican Party endorsed some form of slavery, and only the Republican Party was against it. When both political parties endorse the same behaviors, it is time for a third party.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
There is No Middle Ground
Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.
If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law: if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts, on the part of the people, to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
John Marshall (Marbury vs. Madison)
If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law: if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts, on the part of the people, to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
John Marshall (Marbury vs. Madison)
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Why Women Should NOT Be Allowed in Combat
Why should women not be allowed to serve in combat? 1. A 130lb woman cannot carry a 225lb wounded man off the battlefield. 2. The fact that a woman can be raped will be used by the enemy in order to manipulate/torture our forces. 3. It does not promote unit cohesion. If the only reason that women desire to be in combat is to be promoted to higher levels in the military, then these reasons are selfish as they are putting their own desires above what is best for the military.
Special thanks to Michael Savage. Listen his entire argument here: http://ow.ly/humpT
Special thanks to Michael Savage. Listen his entire argument here: http://ow.ly/humpT
Labels:
california,
christ,
christian,
christian perspective,
conservative,
constitution,
free speech,
freedom,
God,
Jesus,
Lord,
president
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Warriorwoman91 to Hillary Clinton: What Difference Does It Make?
The Secretary of State asked what difference does it make as to whether the administration lied about what happened in Benghazi, so long as we bring whomever killed the four Americans there to justice? The difference, ma'am, is whether you and the administration are culpable for deliberately covering up the circumstances of Benghazi in order to benefit yourselves politically. The difference is whether you and the administration need to ultimately be brought to justice.
Labels:
Benghazi,
california,
christian,
christian perspective,
constitution,
end times,
God,
Lord,
politics,
president,
Savior,
sin,
tea party,
tea party patriots
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Abuses and Usurpations
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
-The Declaration of Independence
-The Declaration of Independence
Labels:
california,
christ,
christian,
christian perspective,
constitution,
free speech,
freedom,
God,
guns,
Jesus,
president,
Savior,
tea party,
tea party patriots
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
The Declaration of Independence vs. Progressivism
The modern definition of equality is incompatible with the Declaration’s definition because the Declaration states that “all men are created equal” meaning that they are all born with the same human rights that the government is required to respect. The modern definition is that all men are not created equal and the government needs to step in and via redistribution, make them equal.
Labels:
california,
christ,
christian,
christian perspective,
constitution,
free speech,
freedom,
God,
Jesus,
politics,
president,
tea party,
tea party patriots
Monday, January 14, 2013
Letter to Democrats that are Surprised that Their Taxes Went Up
Dear
(insert name that voted for Obama),
You have no right to complain about
how your income is less and your taxes are higher. I (and others) have
tried to explain time and time again that a vote for Obama is a vote for
higher taxes--the welfare state that you desire cannot sustain itself
otherwise! However, you refused to listen and voted for him anyway.
Basically, I'm trying to say in the nicest way possible: you made your
bed, now sleep in it.
Respectfully yours, one ticked off Kelly.
My apologies to anyone that was made nervous by this post.
You have no right to complain about how your income is less and your taxes are higher. I (and others) have tried to explain time and time again that a vote for Obama is a vote for higher taxes--the welfare state that you desire cannot sustain itself otherwise! However, you refused to listen and voted for him anyway. Basically, I'm trying to say in the nicest way possible: you made your bed, now sleep in it.
Respectfully yours, one ticked off Kelly.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
